ABSTRACT. Given the context of the above quotation and his overall writings, it is clear that Wittgenstein was genuinely puzzled over religious beliefs. He neither claimed to be a religious believer nor an opponent. He was uncertain what to make of either position. What would it mean to say that one knew “how God should act”? How would this claim enter, if at all, into a person’s reasons for adopting religious belief, and would it be sufficient to make one change one’s direction in life? Do religious beliefs present their own set of legitimate problems on an entirely different plane from non-religious beliefs, and, if so, what sort of criteria is at stake? Such questions lie at the heart of Wittgenstein’s investigation of religious belief. He stated: “I am not a religious man but I cannot help seeing every problem from a religious point of view.” In this paper, the author contends that Wittgenstein should be viewed as a deeply religious thinker in methodological approach and fervor, rather than considered religious as a result of subscribing to doctrinally held beliefs. The author will explore this thesis by examining Wittgenstein’s critical pathways of thought in the Lectures on Religious Belief. pp. 111–124

Keywords: religious belief, tacit presupposition, explicated grammar, language game, evidence


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Fordham University


Home | About Us | Events | Our Team | Contributors | Peer Reviewers | Editing Services | Books | Contact | Online Access

© 2009 Addleton Academic Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Joomla templates by Joomlashine