Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences Contemporary Science Association Global studies in education at Waikato

INFINITE ETHICS PDF Print E-mail
Written by NICK BOSTROM   
ABSTRACT. Aggregative consequentialism and several other popular moral theories are threatened with paralysis: when coupled with some plausible assumptions, they seem to imply that it is always ethically indifferent what you do. Modern cosmology teaches that the world might well contain an infinite number of happy and sad people and other candidate value-bearing locations. Aggregative ethics implies that such a world contains an infinite amount of positive value and an infinite amount of negative value. You can affect only a finite amount of good or bad. In standard cardinal arithmetic, an infinite quantity is unchanged by the addition or subtraction of any finite quantity. So it appears you cannot change the value of the world.  Modifications of aggregationism aimed at resolving the paralysis are only partially effective and cause severe side effects, including problems of “fanaticism”, “distortion”, and erosion of the intuitions that originally motivated the theory. Is the infinitarian challenge fatal? pp. 9–59

Keywords: aggregative, consequentialism, ethics, infinite, cosmology, value
 

Show Other Articles Of This Author

Close Window   X

Notice to readers

 

In order to view full text of this article, you must be a paid Addleton journals subscriber or purchase electronic access to this article. You may also purchase a print copy of this article.